Chiropractic Chronicle Archive

Archive of The Chronicle of Chiropractic.

The WFC's Failed Envoy: Brad Beira’s Brief and Telling Reign at the WFC

Originally published: 2025-10-28

Background

Brad Beira’s abrupt departure as Secretary General of the World Federation of Chiropractic (WFC) comes amid a wave of turmoil shaking the very institutions that make up what many call the “Chiropractic Cartel.” His short-lived appointment and the simultaneous installation of Dr. John Maltby as “interim” replacement are unfolding against a backdrop of mass resignations from the International Chiropractors Association (ICA), including Board members, Representative Assembly delegates, and long-time members, all protesting the ICA’s continued support of the WFC. For years, ICA leaders and members have called for the organization to sever ties with the WFC, viewing it as a vehicle for centralization, medicalization, and global control of chiropractic education and licensure. That drumbeat reached a crescendo this past month with the mass ICA resignations. Beira’s inability to quell that dissent or reconcile the ICA’s growing internal revolt against the WFC may have sealed his fate.

A Short-Lived Tenure

Brad Beira’s tenure as Secretary General of the World Federation of Chiropractic (WFC) was brief and telling. His appointment in early 2024 was meant to mark a new era of diplomacy, inclusion, and alignment between the WFC and its North American stakeholders. Yet less than a year later, Beira was out. Behind the formal language of transition and gratitude in the WFC’s official announcement lies a deeper story: Beira failed to deliver what the WFC needed most: the backing of the laggards within the schools, associations, trade organizations and private corporations that make up the Chiropractic Cartel. Those laggards are demanding the dismantling of the Cartel, its monopolies and Good Ole’ Boy network that provide its scaffolding.

“Beira couldn’t sell the message that the WFC’s global ambitions were compatible with the independence and philosophy of its North American counterparts.”

The Impossible Assignment

At the core of Beira’s downfall was his inability to reconcile a widening divide between the WFC and factions of the chiropractic profession that have grown increasingly distrustful of it, most notably leaders and members of the International Chiropractors Association (ICA).

CLICK HERE for more on that story

Multiple sources indicate that Beira’s outreach efforts to the ICA oppositional contingent during meetings such as those of the Chiropractic Summit Group, fell flat. His attempts to convince the disillusioned ICA leaders that the WFC’s agenda was inclusive and apolitical were met with skepticism and outright resistance. The refusal of the WFC to get out of the WHO and UN are at the core of the debate.

Instead of diffusing tension, Beira’s overtures exposed just how entrenched the opposition had become. The WFC issue within the ICA, marked by public resignations and blistering critiques of its governance and ideology, accelerated during his tenure. For the WFC and the ICA, this represented more than a political embarrassment. It threatened to fracture the global network of influence that the WFC, NBCE, FCLB, and CCE have spent decades cultivating.

Given that key ICA Board members such as Stephen Welsh and Jason Jaeger have deep ties to the WFC, NBCE and other key factions involved in the globalization of chiropractic education and practice the relationship between the WFC and ICA had to be solidified.

United States Schools Complicit

The WFC has already convinced several chiropractic programs in the United States to go along with their scheme to control the globalization of chiropractic education including:

What the WFC Needed and Didn’t Get

The WFC’s immediate strategic need wasn’t more diplomacy, it was consolidation. As the WFC, along with its allied partners including, the National Board of Chiropractic Examiners (NBCE) and the Council on Chiropractic Education (CCE), pushed forward the creation of the International Chiropractic Education Alliance (ICEA), it required buy-in from every corner of the profession.

CLICK HERE for more on that story

The ICEA is being marketed as a neutral, unifying platform for chiropractic education worldwide, a space for “sharing best practices” and “advocating for high and consistent standards.” But critics argue it’s a transparent power play, an attempt by the Cartel to extend its monopoly beyond North America by embedding the same regulatory and educational structures internationally.

“The ICEA is the WFC’s Trojan horse, a globalized version of the same centralized control that has strangled chiropractic innovation in the United States.”

Beira’s inability to rally the ICA, which has historically served as a counterbalance to the WFC, ACA-aligned Cartel establishment, left the WFC without a credible claim to unity. Without the ICA’s participation, the ICEA’s “global consensus” narrative looks incomplete and politically contrived.

A Numbers Game: The Global Education Mirage

Part of the WFC’s justification for launching the ICEA rests on a claim that there are now more chiropractic programs outside North America than within it. While technically true, this statistic conceals a far more revealing fact: those programs are small.

Outside of the U.S. and Canada, most chiropractic schools enroll only a few dozen students. By contrast, American programs collectively educate the vast majority of the 10,000 plus chiropractic students enrolled worldwide. The WFC’s global education project, therefore, isn’t about proportional representation, it’s about influence, branding, and control.

With the CCE and NBCE already positioned as “founding members” of the ICEA, the Cartel’s intent is clear, to replicate the U.S. accreditation and licensing control globally, ensuring that chiropractic education everywhere aligns with their model, one that marginalizes subluxation-based, vitalistic philosophy in favor of a biomedical paradigm. They want to unravel the long held status of chiropractic as a separate and distinct profession and “integrate” it within medicine.

The Political Fallout and Maltby’s Arrival

Beira’s ouster was inevitable once it became clear that he couldn’t unify the profession’s US counterparts and quell the resistance within the ICA. In his place, the WFC appointed Dr. John Maltby, a familiar face with deep ties to the ICA, the U.S. chiropractic establishment, and the Cartel-aligned institutions.

Maltby’s selection is not about reform but about strategy. His connections may allow the ICA to proceed easily with its support of the WFC and its WHO/UN agenda and accelerate ICEA’s rollout.

Maltby joins two other U.S.-based board members on the WFC’s North American region roster, namely Drs. Dale White and Holly Tucker. With Maltby now elevated to the WFC leadership, this bolsters U.S. influence within what has traditionally been a more globally diversified body. It positions American-based leadership to help fold key aspects of WFC’s policies into the ICA and related organizations and groups. In effect, the strengthened U.S. trio helps the WFC build a bridge from North American institutions and regulatory frameworks into its broader global ambitions, making it easier for the WFC’s initiatives, such as the International Chiropractic Education Alliance (ICEA), to homogenize accreditation, licensure, and association alignment into emerging chiropractic markets abroad.

But Maltby’s appointment also signals a doubling down on the same consolidation efforts that have driven the ICA’s exodus and alienated the profession’s philosophical base.

“Maltby’s job isn’t to change course, it’s to make the same plan succeed where Beira failed.”

The Larger Picture: Power, Monopoly, and Mission Drift

Brad Beira’s fall from the WFC’s top post is not just a personnel shuffle. It’s a symptom of a deeper institutional pathology, an obsession with control disguised as collaboration.

By linking global chiropractic education, accreditation, testing, and regulation under a single network of interlocking organizations, WFC, ICA, NBCE, CCE, and the Chiropractic Summit Group, the Chiropractic Cartel is attempting to globalize its monopoly. The ICEA is the latest instrument in that design, and Beira’s inability to sell the WFC to dissenting factions made his position untenable.

“Beira was a casualty of the Cartel’s ambition, not because he opposed it, but because he couldn’t deliver it fast enough.”

As the WFC now moves forward under Maltby’s leadership, the question is not whether the Cartel will continue its expansion, but whether the profession will recognize the price of unity under centralized control.

Back to archive